next up previous
Next: About this document ... Up: Research Note: New Polynomial Previous: Acknowledgments

Bibliography

AFM02
Amilhastre, J., Fargier, H., & Marquis, P. (2002).
Consistency restoration and explanations in dynamic CSPs -- application to configuration.
Artificial Intelligence, 135(1-2), 199-234.

BHM99
Beckert, B., Hähnle, R., & Manyà, F. (1999).
Transformations between signed and classical clause logic.
In Proc. 29th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logics (ISMVL'99), pp. 248-255. IEEE Computer Society Press.

BATJ89
Bylander, T., Allemang, D., Tanner, M., & Josephson, J. (1989).
Some results concerning the computational complexity of abduction.
In Proc. 1st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'89), pp. 44-54. Morgan Kaufmann.

CM98
Coste-Marquis, S., & Marquis, P. (1998).
Characterizing consistency-based diagnoses.
In Proc. 5th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics (AIMATH'98).

CUR84
Curtis, C. (1984).
Linear algebra. An introductory approach.
Springer Verlag.

Val00
del Val, A. (2000).
The complexity of restricted consequence finding and abduction.
In Proc. 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'00), pp. 337-342. AAAI Press/MIT Press.

EG95
Eiter, T., & Gottlob, G. (1995).
The complexity of logic-based abduction.
Journal of the ACM, 42(1), 3-42.

EM02
Eiter, T., & Makino, K. (2002).
On computing all abductive explanations.
In Proc. 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'02), pp. 62-67. AAAI Press.

Esh93
Eshghi, K. (1993).
A tractable class of abduction problems.
In Proc. 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'93), pp. 3-8. Morgan Kaufmann.

Goe97
Goebel, R. (1997).
Abduction and its relation to constrained induction.
In Proc. IJCAI'97 workshop on abduction and induction in AI.

HSAM93
Hobbs, J., Stickel, M., Appelt, D., & Martin, P. (1993).
Interpretation as abduction.
Artificial Intelligence, 63, 69-142.

KS98
Kavvadias, D., & Sideri, M. (1998).
The inverse satisfiability problem.
SIAM Journal on Computing, 28(1), 152-163.

KR96
Khardon, R., & Roth, D. (1996).
Reasoning with models.
Artificial Intelligence, 87, 187-213.

LLM02
Lang, J., Liberatore, P., & Marquis, P. (2002).
Conditional independence in propositional logic.
Artificial Intelligence, 141, 79-121.

Mar00
Marquis, P. (2000).
Consequence finding algorithms.
In Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems (DRUMS), Vol. 5, pp. 41-145. Kluwer Academic.

RK87
Reiter, R., & de Kleer, J. (1987).
Foundations of assumption-based truth maintenance systems: preliminary report.
In Proc. 6th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'87), pp. 183-188. AAAI Press/MIT Press.

Sch78
Schaefer, T. (1978).
The complexity of satisfiability problems.
In Proc. 10th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory Of Computing (STOC'78), pp. 216-226. ACM Press.

SL90
Selman, B., & Levesque, H. (1990).
Abductive and default reasoning: a computational core.
In Proc. 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'90), pp. 343-348. AAAI Press.

SW01
Stumptner, M., & Wotawa, F. (2001).
Diagnosing tree-structured systems.
Artificial Intelligence, 127, 1-29.

Zan02
Zanuttini, B. (2002).
Approximating propositional knowledge with affine formulas.
In Proc. 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'02), pp. 287-291. IOS Press.

Zan03
Zanuttini, B. (2003).
New polynomial classes for logic-based abduction.
Tech. rep., Université de Caen, France.



Bruno Zanuttini 2003-06-30