Next: Appendix A. Questionnaire
Up: A Personalized System for
Previous: Evaluation
Conclusions
In this paper, we described an intelligent adaptive conversational
assistant designed to help people select an item.
Overall, we made significant inroads into methods for
unobtrusively acquiring an individual, long term user model during
recommendation conversations.
We expanded on previous work on adaptive recommendation systems that
were not conversational, and on dialogue systems that were not user
adaptive.
Our long-term goal is to develop even
more powerful methods, capable of adapting to a user's needs, goals, and
preferences over multiple conversations.
While we leveraged off the
feedback between conversation and recommendation, such feedback is
likely to be present in other tasks such as planning or scheduling.
The two key problems addressed by our research are the design of
adaptive recommendation systems when conversations are the interaction
mode, and the addition of personalization to dialogue systems,
starting here with dialogues for recommendation. Thus, unlike many
recommendation systems that accept keywords and produce a ranked list,
this one carries out a conversation with the user to progressively
narrow his options. In solving these problems, we introduced a novel
approach to the acquisition, use, and representation of user models.
Unlike many other adaptive interfaces, our system constructs and
utilizes user models that include information beyond complete item
preferences. This is key for the support of personalization in
conversations. We used a relatively simple model of dialogue to focus
on the issues involved in personalization. We also described
experimental results showing the promise of our technique,
demonstrating a reduction in both the number of interactions and in
the conversation time for users interacting with our adaptive system
when compared to a control group.
Of course, there are still several open questions and opportunities
for improvement. The user model, conversational model, and search
models are functional but we plan to improve them further. We are
also extending our conversational approach to items other than
destinations, such as books and movies, and we plan to link the system
to other assistants like the Adaptive Route Advisor
[65]. Our goal for such additions is to provide new
functionality that will make the ADAPTIVE PLACE ADVISOR more
attractive to users, but also to test the generality of our approach
for adaptive recommendation. In turn, this should bring us closer to
truly flexible computational aides that carry out natural dialogues
with humans.
Acknowledgments
This research was carried out while the first author was at the Center
for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, and
the other authors were at the DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology
Center in Palo Alto, California. We thank Renée Elio, Afsaneh
Haddadi, and Jeff Shrager for the initial conception and design of the
ADAPTIVE PLACE ADVISOR, Cynthia Kuo and Zhao-Ping Tang for help with
the implementation effort, and Stanley Peters for enlightening
discussions about the design of conversational interfaces. Robert
Mertens and Dana Dahlstrom were crucial in carrying out the user
studies.
Next: Appendix A. Questionnaire
Up: A Personalized System for
Previous: Evaluation
Cindi Thompson
2004-03-29