Bibliography

1

Leila Amgoud and Claudette Cayrol.
On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation.
In G. F. Cooper and S. Moral, editors, Proc. of the 14$^{th}$ Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 1-7, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998. Morgan-Kaufmann.

2

Leila Amgoud and Claudette Cayrol.
Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks.
Journal of Automated Reasoning, 29:125-169, 2002.

3

Trevor J.M. Bench-Capon.
Value based argumentation frameworks.
In Benferhat and Giunchiglia, editors, Proc. of the 9$^{th}$ International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning (session on Argument, Dialogue and Decision), pages 444-453, Toulouse, France, 2002.

4

Philippe Besnard and Anthony Hunter.
A logic-based theory of deductive arguments.
Artificial Intelligence, 128 (1-2):203-235, 2001.

5

Claudette Cayrol and Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex.
Critique et amélioration de l'évaluation graduelle par tuples pour le traitement des circuits.
Rapport de recherche 2003-13-R, Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse (I.R.I.T.), France, September 2003.

6

Claudette Cayrol and Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex.
Gradual acceptability in argumentation systems.
In Proc. of the 3$^{rd}$ CMNA (International workshop on computational models of natural argument), pages 55-58, Acapulco, Mexique, 2003.

7

Claudette Cayrol and Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex.
Gradual handling of contradiction in argumentation frameworks.
In B. Bouchon-Meunier, L.Foulloy, and R.R. Yager, editors, Intelligent Systems for Information Processing: From representation to Applications, chapter Reasoning, pages 179-190. Elsevier, 2003.

8

Sylvie Doutre.
Autour de la sémantique préférée des systèmes d'argumentation.
Thèse, Université Paul Sabatier, IRIT, 2002.

9

Phan Minh Dung.
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.
Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.

10

Paul E. Dunne and Trevor J.M. Bench-Capon.
Coherence in finite argument systems.
Technical report 01-006, University of Liverpool, Department of Computer Science (U.L.C.S.), 2001.

11

Paul E. Dunne and Trevor J.M. Bench-Capon.
Coherence in finite argument system.
Artificial Intelligence, 141(1-2):187-203, 2002.

12

Morten Elvang-Goransson, John Fox, and Paul Krause.
Dialectic reasoning with inconsistent information.
In David Heckerman and Abe Mamdani, editors, Proc. of the 9$^{th}$ UAI, pages 114-121, Washington, DC, 1993. Morgan-Kaufmann.

13

Hadassa Jakobovits and Dick Vermeir.
Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks.
Journal of logic and computation, 9(2):215-261, 1999.

14

Nikos Karacapilidis and Dimitris Papadias.
Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system.
Information systems, 26(4):259-277, 2001.

15

Jürg Kohlas, Rolf Haenni, and Dritan Berzati.
Probabilistic argumentation systems and abduction.
In Proc. of the 8$^{th}$ International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning - special session on Uncertainty Frameworks in Non-Monotonic Reasoning, pages 391-398, Breckenridge, Colorado, 2000.

16

Paul Krause, Simon Ambler, Morten Elvang, and John Fox.
A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty.
Computational Intelligence, 11 (1):113-131, 1995.

17

F. Lin and Y. Shoham.
Argument systems - a uniform basis for non-monotonic reasoning.
In Proc. of the first International Conference On Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pages 245-255, 1989.

18

Simon Parsons.
Normative argumentation and qualitative probability.
In Proc. of the first International Joint Conference on Qualitative and quantitative practical reasoning, ECSQARU-FAPR, LNAI 1244, pages 466-480, Germany, 1997.

19

Gadi Pinkas and Ronald P. Loui.
Reasoning from inconsistency: A taxonomy of principles for resolving conflict.
In J.A. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall, editors, Proc. of the 3$^{rd}$ KR, pages 709-719, Cambridge, MA, 1992. Morgan-Kaufmann.

20

J. L. Pollock.
How to reason defeasibly.
Artificial Intelligence, 57:1-42, 1992.

21

J. L. Pollock.
Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification.
Artificial Intelligence, 133:233-282, 2001.

22

Henry Prakken and Giovanni Sartor.
Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities.
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 7:25-75, 1997.

23

G.R. Simari and R.P. Loui.
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
Artificial Intelligence, 53:125-157, 1992.

24

Bart Verheij.
On the existence and multiplicity of extension in dialectical argumentation.
In Salem Benferhat and Enrico Giunchiglia, editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR'2002), pages 416-425, 2002.

25

G. Vreeswijk.
Abstract argumentation systems.
Artificial Intelligence, 90:225-279, 1997.

26

N.H. Xuong.
Mathématiques discrètes et informatique.
Masson, 1992.