1 |
Tues, Jan 11, 2011 |
Introduction Given by: Brad Myers
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture 1
Required Readings:
-
Brad A. Myers, John F. Pane and Andy Ko, "Natural Programming Languages
and Environments".
Communications of the ACM.
(special issue on End-User Development). Sept, 2004, vol. 47, no. 9. pp.
47-52.
pdf
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
Homework: Fill out survey about what topics should be
covered: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/TVSTMD7 |
2 |
Thurs, Jan 13, 2011 |
HCI Research Methods, part 1: Using exploratory and
evaluation studies Given by: Thomas LaToza
PDF of Slides for Lecture 2
Required Readings:
-
Saul Greenberg and Bill Buxton. 2008.
Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In
Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors
in computing systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 111-120.
-
This paper,
despite ostensibly being about the risks of usability evaluation,
is really about how the whole HCI design process works or should
work, how to do it rigorously, and the role of usability
evaluation and other evaluations in this.
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
|
3 |
Tues, Jan 18, 2011 |
HCI Research Methods, part 2: Analyzing data Given by: Thomas LaToza
PDF of Slides for Lecture 3
Required Readings:
-
B. A. Kitchenham, S. L. Pfleeger, L. M. Pickard, et al.. "Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering."
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 8. (2002), pp. 721-734.
Saul Greenberg and Bill Buxton. 2008.
-
This paper is all about the method, data analysis, and result details that you should
do and report in writing a paper when running at study.
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
|
4 |
Thurs, Jan 20, 2011 |
5.2 Designing and Documenting APIs Given by: Brad Myers
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture 4
Required Readings:
- Brian Ellis, Jeffrey Stylos, and Brad Myers. "The Factory Pattern
in API Design: A Usability Evaluation". International Conference on
Software Engineering (ICSE'2007). May 20-26, 2007. Minneapolis,
MN. pp. 302-312.
ACM or
local pdf
.
- This paper is about a study of the Factory Pattern. We
started by asking how developers would "naturally" express
creating objects, in which none used factories, and then performed
a lab study, and found that the time to develop using factories took 2.1 to 5.3 times longer compared to regular constructors
across a variety of tasks.
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
|
5 |
Tues, Jan 25 |
6.1 Exploring code Presented by Thomas LaToza
PDF of Slides for Lecture 5
Required Readings:
-
Thomas D. LaToza and Brad A. Myers. 2010.
Developers ask reachability questions. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International
Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1 (ICSE '10), Vol. 1. ACM,
New York, NY, USA, 185-194
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
(Brad may be away) |
6 |
Thurs, Jan 27 |
PDF of Slides for Lecture 6
Required Readings:
-
Herbsleb, J.D. & Mockus, A.
(2003). An empirical study of speed and communication in
globally-distributed software development. IEEE Transactions on
Software Engineering, 29(3), 1-14. (pdf).
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
(Brad may be away) |
7 |
Tues, Feb 1 |
8.3 Debugging Presented by Thomas LaToza
PDF of Slides for Lecture 7
Required Readings:
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
(Brad may be away) |
8 |
Thurs, Feb 3 |
Groups Present Their Initial Plans
|
9 |
Tues, Feb 8 |
3.2 Software Visualization Presented by Brad Myers
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture 9
Required Readings:
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
|
10 |
Thurs, Feb 10 |
7.6 Navigating working sets Presented by Brad Myers
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture 10
Required Readings:
-
Ko, A. J., Aung, H., and Myers, B. A. (2005). Eliciting Design
Requirements for Maintenance-Oriented IDEs: A Detailed Study of
Corrective and Perfective Maintenance Tasks. International
Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'05). St. Louis, MO: pp.
126-135. (Winner, Distinguished Paper Award).
pdf
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
|
11 |
Tues, Feb 15 |
3.1 Learning to program, how people naturally think about computation
Presented by Cyrus Omar
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture 11
Required Readings:
-
Gary Lewandowski, Dennis J. Bouvier, Robert McCartney, Kate Sanders,
and Beth Simon. Commonsense computing (episode 3): concurrency and
concert tickets. In Proceedings of the third international workshop
on Computing education research (ICER '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA,
133-144. ACM
DL or
pdf
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
|
12 |
Thurs, Feb 17 |
4.1 Designing with Diagrams Presented by Chris Martens
PDF of Slides for Lecture 12
Required Readings:
-
Helen C. Purchase, Ray Welland, Matthew McGill, Linda Colpoys.
(2004). Comprehension of diagram syntax: an empirical study of entity
relationship notations. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 61(2):
187-203.
pdf
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
|
13 |
Tues, Feb 22 |
4.3 Finding experts, maintaining awareness, onboarding
Presented by Kun Niu
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture 13
Required Readings:
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
|
|
Thurs, Feb 24 |
NO CLASS: presentations postponed until Friday, March 4
|
14 |
Tues, Mar 1 |
5.1 Finding code to reuse Presented by Kerry Chang
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture 14
Required Readings:
-
Yunwen Ye and Gerhard Fischer. 2002. Supporting reuse by delivering
task-relevant and personalized information. In Proceedings of the 24th
International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '02). ACM, New
York, NY, USA, 513-523. ACM DL
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
(Brad will be away) |
15 |
Thurs, Mar 3 |
6.3 Reading code (program comprehension, mental models of programs, and effects of expertise)
Presented by Stephen Oney
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture 15
Required Readings:
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic) |
16 |
Friday, March 4 |
Special class: 10:30-11:50 in Gates GHC 5222 Groups Present Their Study of Existing Practice
|
|
Monday, March 7 -- Mid-Semester Grades Due for Students
|
|
Tues, Mar 8 |
No class, Spring Break |
|
Thurs, Mar 10 |
No class, Spring Break |
17 |
Tues, Mar 15 |
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture 17
Required Readings:
-
Mike Phillips and Sandy Shrum,
“Process Improvement for All: What to Expect from CMMIVersion
1.3”, IEEE Crosstalk, January/February 2010, pp. 10-14,
IEEE pdf or
local pdf
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic) |
18 |
Thurs, Mar 17 |
8.1 Causes of bugs, preventing bugs Presented by Joshua Sunshine
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture 18
Required Readings:
-
Nachiappan Nagappan, Thomas
Ball, Andreas Zeller.
"Mining Metrics to Predict
Component Failures". Proceedings of the International Conference on
Software Engineering, Shanghai, China, May 2006.
ACM DL.
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic) |
19 |
Tues, Mar 22 |
7.3 Visual languages Presented by Vishal Dwivedi
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture 19
Required Readings:
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic) |
20 |
Thurs, Mar 24 |
7.5 Evolving and improving code: (Copy and paste; Refactoring; Reviewing changes)
Presented by YoungSeok Yoon
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture
20
Required Readings:
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic)
(Brad may be away) |
21 |
Tues, Mar 29 |
9.2 End-User Programming for Scientists Presented by Cyrus Omar
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture
21
Required Readings:
-
Judith Segal. 2008.
"Models of Scientific Software Development," In Proc. 2008 Workshop
Software Eng. in Computational Science and Eng. (SECSE08). 13 May 2008, Leipzig, Germany.
pdf.
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic) |
22 |
Thurs, Mar 31 |
7.1 Languages and tools for novice and end-user programmers
Presented by Brad Myers
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture
22
Required Readings:
-
Caitlin Kelleher and Randy Pausch. “Lowering the barriers to
programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and
languages for novice programmers,” ACM Comput. Surv. 2005.
37(2). pp. 83-137.
ACM
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic) |
23 |
Tues, April 5 |
Groups Present Their Prototype of a New Tool
|
24 |
Thurs, April 7 |
10. Programming Processes (Pair Programming; Agile; Test-driven development; Code organization techniques)
Presented by Kun Niu
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture
24
Required Readings:
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic) |
25 |
Tues, April 12 |
7.2 Programming by example Presented by Kerry Chang
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture
25
Required Readings:
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic) (Brad may be away)
|
|
Thurs, April 14 |
No Class: Spring Carnival |
26 |
Tues, April 19 |
7.4 Textual languages and editors Presented
by Stephen Oney
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture
26
Required Readings:
-
Andrew J. Ko and Brad A. Myers. "Citrus: A Toolkit for
Simplifying the Creation of Structured Editors for Code and
Data." ACM
Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST'05, October 23-26, 2005, Seattle, WA. pp. 3-12.
pdf
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic) (Brad may be away) |
27 |
Thurs, April 21 |
9.1 End-User Software Engineering in General Presented
by Vishal Dwivedi
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture
27
Required Readings:
-
Margaret Burnett, "What Is End-User Software Engineering and Why Does It
Matter?". IS-EUD'09 invited paper.
pdf
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic) |
28 |
Tues, April 26 |
8.2 Reporting and triaging bugs presented by YoungSeok Yoon
PowerPoint Slides for Lecture
28
Required Readings:
-
Philip J. Guo, Thomas Zimmermann, Nachiappan Nagappan, Brendan Murphy. "Characterizing and Predicting Which Bugs Get Fixed: An Empirical Study of Microsoft Windows." In
Proceedings of the 32th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2010), Cape Town, South Africa, May 2010.
pdf
(Additional Readings listed on
the GoogleDocs for this topic) |
29 |
Thurs, April 28 |
Groups Present Their Lab study comparing two versions
|
Spring 2011 Semester |
|
|
|
Semester: (M-14.5, T-15, W-15, Th-14, F-13)
Total=71.5 |
|
|
|
Date |
Day |
|
January 10 |
M |
Semester & Mini-3 Classes Begin |
January 17 |
M |
Martin Luther King Day;
No Classes after 12:30 p.m. (all colleges, all courses;
including evening classes) |
January 21 |
F |
Semester Course Add Deadline without Dean's
Permission |
January 21 |
F |
Semester Course Audit Grade Option Deadline |
March 4 |
F |
Mid-Semester Break;
No Classes |
March 7 |
M |
Mid-Semester Grades Due by 9 p.m. |
March 7-11 |
M-F |
Spring Break;
No Classes |
March 28 |
M |
Semester Course Drop and Pass/Fail Grade Option
Deadline; Assign Withdrawal
Grade for Course Dropping After This Date |
April 14 |
Th |
No Classes (except Tepper/Heinz) |
Apr. 15-16 |
F-Sa |
Spring Carnival; No Classes (except Tepper/Heinz) |
April 18-22 |
M-F |
Fall 2011 Registration Week |
Apr. 18-May 10 |
M-T |
Semester Faculty Course Evaluations |
April 29 |
F |
Semester Last Day of Classes |
April 29 |
F |
Semester Course Drop Deadline to Receive a
Withdrawal Grade |
May 12 |
Th |
Final Grades for graduating students due by 6
p.m. |
May 15 |
Su |
Commencement |
May 17 |
T |
Final Grades for non-graduating students due by 4
p.m. |