The TradeSports data
In[153]:=
The table itself is in this node
Analysis
The two big assumptions here are that the outcomes for the various "states" (we think of D.C. as a state) are independent Bernoulli trials, and that the TradeSports quotes are reasonable proxies for the means of these trials. Neither is a particularly believable assumption, but it's the best I can do. Also, no attempt is made to account for non-winner-takes-all outcomes in ME, NE, or CO, nor for the vagaries of faithless electors.
Total EVs up for grabs
In[316]:=
Out[316]=
Dynamic program for the PDF over EVs
In[317]:=
The PDF and CDF
In[319]:=
In[320]:=
The mean Bush-advantage
In[321]:=
Out[321]=
Other parameters of the distribution. Probability of Bush loss/tie/win is 41.7%, 1.5%, 56.8%
In[322]:=
Out[322]=
In[66]:=
Log plot of the PDF
In[323]:=
Out[323]=
The binomial distribution with the same mean, for comparison
In[117]:=
In[324]:=
Out[324]=
In[325]:=
Out[325]=
Plot of the PDF, with the binomial distribution for comparison
In[326]:=
In[327]:=
In[328]:=
Plot of the CDF
In[329]:=
In[330]:=
In[331]:=
Quintiles
In[332]:=
Out[332]=
Hmm... the CDF is shockingly linear between 20% and 80%. Is there a simple explanation for that?
The following revised dynamic program computes a PDF for a given subset of the states.
In[333]:=
The PDF of the lose/tie/win variable for a given subset of the states with a given bias
In[335]:=
The entropy of a PDF, in bits
In[336]:=
The entropy of the lose/tie/win variable for a given subset of the states with a given bias
In[337]:=
In[338]:=
Out[338]=
The entropy of the election
In[339]:=
Out[339]=
The conditional entropy over the states l given the result for state n
In[340]:=
The conditional entropies for the various states, as percentages of the total entropy
In[341]:=
Out[341]=
The states sorted by the conditional entropies
In[342]:=
Out[342]=
The upper levels of the decision tree of the lose/tie/win variable
In[343]:=
In[345]:=
Out[345]=
Created by Mathematica (November 1, 2004)