[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Nearterm AVTS 4.x roadmap

Any chance you may be revising the TS doc you did for Alameda to conform to the  R6?
 
just checking
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: Nearterm AVTS 4.x roadmap

This was to read "Santa Barbara is NOT using Ballot Stations". 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: Nearterm AVTS 4.x roadmap

Santa Barbara is using  ballot stations.  So no issue there.  And if Plumas doesn't use the VoterGroup2, then they are not a problem either for the upgrade.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: Nearterm AVTS 4.x roadmap

Fresno - John Elder
Trinity - Karen Rhea
Placer - Steve
Santa Barbara- ?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: Nearterm AVTS 4.x roadmap

CALIFORNIA ACCOUNTS:
 
Let's see if we are in synch on which accounts are affected by the VG2 modfications required of GEMS and Ballot Station.  Accounts I can think of with person responsible are:
  • Marin        Knecht
  • Plumas     Runyan/LaTour
  • Trinity        ?
  • San Luis Obispo    ?
  • Alameda    Chen
Who is handling Trinity and San Luis Obispo?  Are there any others anyone can think of affected by this for March.
If there are others please let us know.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Clark
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:39 PM
Subject: Nearterm AVTS 4.x roadmap

The California declared/nondeclared bug reported by Knecht is going to require a major version number change to fix.  Unfortunately the ballot station currently has no concept of Voter Group 2.  This will require a change in the database format (to store vg2) and a change in the protocol (to transfer vg2).  We were about to release AVTS 4.2 with mp3 compressed audio.  This release will have to be pushed back to make room for the California changes.
 
Strictly adhering to our release policies, the California change should also require a major version number bump to GEMS (because of the protocol change).  We can't reasonably expect all of California to upgrade to 1.18 this late in the game though, so we'll slip the change into GEMS 1.17.21 and declare this a bug rather than a new feature.  What good are rules unless you can bend them now and again.
 
 
In summary:
 
AVTS 4.1 will continue with the minor enhancements requested by Florida.  Once we have the Florida certification paper, we can declare the 4.1 branch pretty much dead.
 
AVTS 4.2 will be released soon (hopefully tomorrow).  It will address the California VG2 issue.  CA will need to run this version in the March primary, along with GEMS 1.17.21.
 
AVTS 4.3 will be released later this week.  It will have support for MP3 compressed audio and Windows CE version 3.0.
 
 
As always, all features will be merged forward.  So, 4.3 will (eventually) contain the 4.1 changes made for Florida.  Keep a close eye on the readme files.
 
Ken