- ...expressions.
- Not to be confused with Woodcock
and Loomes's use of for .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... .
- The symmetry property says that we can do the proof
backwards. Notice that if = were replaced
by we could not do that!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...before.
- It's also possible to reduce both sides of the equation at the same time,
but since you'd really be doing two proof steps simultaneously,
you need to be careful to justify both steps. We do not recommend
this procedure.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.