[OpenAFS] AFS documentation update

[Garance A Drosihn]

At 10:57 AM -0800 9/12/04, ted creedon wrote:
>Considerable progress has been made converting all the IBM
>docs into both Word and Tex.
>
>Does anyone have a preference?
>
>Word compatiblility on Linux is not good unless StarOffice is used.

One goal for OpenAFS is for it to run on as many platforms as
possible, and I would prefer that the documentation for it
should also be usable on as many platforms as possible.

Also, when it comes to large documentation, I believe TeX is
better suited to the task than any word-processing program.  So,
if you are producing it in both formats and just wondering which
one would get used: I (personally) would pick up the TeX version.

I am glad to see this work going into the conversion of the IBM
documentation.  My thanks go to everyone working on it.

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu