RE: GEMS version numbers (RE: North Carolina Export)

["Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>]

I took Guy's comments to be in the future tense.  You are right though, he said "isn't this a" not "wouldn't this be".  Saving the export paramaters is a reasonable RCR, and probably the way yours will be interpreted.  'Course that change (saving export configs) would require recertification for states that are so disposed.  I gather that's not North Carolina though.

 

Ken

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Tyler Links
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 2:58 PM
To: support@gesn.com
Cc: Jeff Dean
Subject: RE: GEMS version numbers (RE: North Carolina Export)

Ken,

 

OK, I’ll bite.  How exactly does one “save the export configuration”?  I looked at the Ca export linkage rcr that Guy suggested, but it didn’t offer any answers.  I also don’t see anything about “saving the export configuration” in the 1.17.x release notes.

 

Please, enlighten me.

 

Tyler

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:24 PM
To: support@gesn.com
Cc: Jeff Dean
Subject: RE: GEMS version numbers (RE: North Carolina Export)

 

From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Guy Lancaster
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:27 PM

  Isn't this a matter of saving the export configuration rather than requiring a new program?    

 

For North Carolina, yes.

 

Ken