Analysis Supplement - Global Graph Distribution Analysis of the Receptor Interactome

 

 

As described in the main text and Supplement S2, the receptor interactome includes interactions for each human membrane receptor in the HPMR database [1]. Totally, there are 904 receptor genes and for each one of them, we identified their potential PPI partners from all possible human genes, 24380 human genes based on the NCBI. The thresholded graph contains ~9100 edges, which relates to 559 membrane receptors and 1750 non-receptors. Note: interactions between non-receptor genes are not evaluated and considered in this graph. Visualizations of this graph are shown in Supplement S4. Biclustering analysis of this predicted receptor interactome is in another Supplement webpage and the graph global distribution studies are included here.   

 

From a graph analysis perspective, the receptor interactome could be treated as an undirected graph, with nodes representing proteins and edges as interactions. This graph combines two networks: the first is an interaction graph between receptors and the second is a bipartite graph between receptors and non-receptors (genes not in HPMR database [1]). The global graph patterns are very important in analyzing the biological networks based on the previously studies [2]. Here we made a series of distribution analysis.

 

All analyses of the predicted receptor interactome are compared with the respective properties of the known receptor interactions retrieved from the HPRD [3].

 

 

1. Hubs in the receptor interactome – predicted and known

 

We identified those receptors having the largest number of protein binding partners as ‘hubs’. Since GPCR and type I receptors have very different properties, we list the hubs of these two families of receptors separately.

 

GPCR Hubs: GPCR hubs refer those GPCR’s having the most gene partners among all GPCR. The top 20 largest GPCR hubs are shown in Table 1.  Entries in the table are ordered by the number of protein partners that each GPCR interacts with. We notice that several of the GPCR hubs are from the chemokine receptor family. Part of this table is also provided in Table 2 of the main text.

 

Table 1           GPCR hubs with the highest number of binding partners: GPCR hub refers those GPCR’s having the most gene partners among all GPCR. Entries are ordered by the number of protein partners that each GPCR interacts with. The top 20 largest GPCR hubs are shown.

 

Gene ID

Gene Symbol

Partner

Size (Predicted)

Partner

Size (HPRD)

Receptor Partner Size (Predicted)

Receptor Partner Size (HPRD)

Gene Receptor Family

976

CD97

60

1

17

0

7TM|B|Orphan|CD97

9620

CELSR1

60

0

28

0

7TM|B|Orphan|CD97

267

AMFR

49

3

6

0

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Chemokine/interleukin

1952

CELSR2

39

0

21

0

7TM|B|Orphan|CD97

2833

CXCR3

24

0

5

0

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Chemokine/interleukin

1234

CCR5

22

21

4

2

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Chemokine/interleukin

2149

F2R

22

7

3

1

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Proteinase-activated/thrombin

1235

CCR6

20

3

3

0

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Chemokine/interleukin

1230

CCR1

20

9

3

0

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Chemokine/interleukin

135

ADORA2A

18

2

2

1

7TM|A|Nucleotide|Adenosine

1910

EDNRB

18

6

3

0

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Bombesin/Gastrin

3579

IL8RB

18

11

1

0

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Chemokine/interleukin

1233

CCR4

16

6

4

0

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Chemokine/interleukin

2550

GABBR1

15

3

0

0

7TM|C|Amine

1238

CCBP2

13

14

0

0

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Chemokine/interleukin

1241

LTB4R

13

1

5

0

7TM|A|Lipid|Leukotriene_B4

2151

F2RL2

12

5

1

0

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Proteinase-activated/thrombin

3577

IL8RA

12

9

2

0

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Chemokine/interleukin

1232

CCR3

11

12

0

0

7TM|A|Polypeptide|Chemokine/interleukin

6608

SMO

10

2

5

2

7TM|Frizzled_Smo

 

 

 

Type I Receptor Hubs: Type I receptors hubs refers to those type I receptors having the largest number of protein binding partners among type I receptors. The entries in Table 2 are ordered by the number of gene partners of each respective type I receptor. Part of this table is in Table 1 of the main text.

 

 

 

Table 2           Type I receptor hubs with the highest number of binding partners: Type I receptors hubs refer to those type I receptors having the largest number of protein binding partners among type I receptors. The top 20 entries are shown. Entries are ordered by the number of gene partners of each respective type I receptor.

 

GeneID

Gene Symbol

Partner

Size (Predict)

Partner

Size (HPRD)

ReceptorPartner

Size (Predict)

ReceptorPartner

Size (HPRD)

Gene Receptor

Family

7048

TGFBR2

217

21

29

5

SerThrK|Type

3688

ITGB1

191

44

60

15

Integrins|ITB-4

2022

ENG

181

10

35

4

Other

5792

PTPRF

172

13

61

2

RPTP|RPTPUI5

2260

FGFR1

172

13

45

0

RTK|FGR

3949

LDLR

163

9

28

0

LDLLRP

657

BMPR1A

161

14

19

2

SerThrK|ALK

659

BMPR2

155

10

26

2

SerThrK|Type

7046

TGFBR1

155

25

21

4

SerThrK|ALK

2064

ERBB2

153

32

45

4

RTK|ERBB/EGF

3480

IGF1R

150

26

50

0

RTK|INSULIN-R

1436

CSF1R

149

11

44

0

RTK|VEGF/PDGF

1956

EGFR

147

91

45

6

RTK|ERBB/EGF

4853

NOTCH2

131

9

35

0

Notch

2050

EPHB4

127

1

51

0

RTK|EPHRIN

4851

NOTCH1

127

17

42

0

Notch

2321

FLT1

124

6

46

1

RTK|VEGF/PDGF

5159

PDGFRB

122

28

44

4

RTK|VEGF/PDGF

1969

EPHA2

119

12

52

0

RTK|EPHRIN

5754

PTK7

117

0

52

0

RTK

 

 

Receptor Core Hubs: We also used the number of receptor only partners as a criterion to search for receptor-receptor interaction hubs in our predicted receptor interactome. Receptor hub here refers to a hub in the receptor to receptor subgraph. The top 20 most highly ranked receptors are listed in Table 3. They are ordered by the number of the receptor interaction partners. We found that all of them belonged to the Type I receptor family.

 

 

Table 3           Receptor core hubs binding to the largest number of receptor partners: We used the number of receptor only partners as a criterion to search for receptor-receptor interaction hubs in our predicted receptor interactome. Receptor hub in this subsection refers to a hub in the receptor versus receptor subgraph. Here the top 20 ranked receptors are listed. They are ordered by increasing size of the number of receptor binding partners. All of them belonged to the Type I receptor family.

Gene ID

Gene Symbol

Receptor Partner

Size (Predict)

Receptor Partner

Size (HPRD)

GPCR Partner

Size (Predict)

GPCR Partner

Size (HPRD)

Receptor family

 

5792

PTPRF

65

2

3

0

RPTP|RPTPUI5

3688

ITGB1

64

15

6

0

Integrins|ITB-4

2050

EPHB4

51

0

1

0

RTK|EPHRIN

5754

PTK7

51

0

1

0

RTK

3480

IGF1R

49

0

0

0

RTK|INSULIN-R

1436

CSF1R

47

0

5

0

RTK|VEGF/PDGF

2321

FLT1

47

1

1

0

RTK|VEGF/PDGF

5159

PDGFRB

47

4

0

1

RTK|VEGF/PDGF

780

DDR1

47

0

2

0

RTK|DDR

2260

FGFR1

46

0

2

0

RTK|FGR

1956

EGFR

45

6

0

0

RTK|ERBB/EGF

2064

ERBB2

44

4

1

0

RTK|ERBB/EGF

3643

INSR

44

2

1

0

RTK|INSULIN-R

4919

ROR1

44

0

1

0

RTK|ROR

4920

ROR2

43

0

1

0

RTK|ROR

1969

EPHA2

41

0

1

0

RTK|EPHRIN

4233

MET

41

0

0

0

RTK|MET

2044

EPHA5

40

0

1

0

RTK|EPHRINs

558

AXL

40

0

0

0

RTK|TYR/MER/UFO

2065

ERBB3

39

3

0

0

RTK|ERBB/EGF

5156

PDGFRA

39

3

0

0

RTK|VEGF/PDGF


 

 

 

2. Degree distribution of the receptor interactome – predicted and known

 

Previous studies [2] show that biological networks are usually obeying a power law distribution. This is also true for our receptor interactome. In the following, we report a series of degree distributions for receptors with respect to different types of interaction partners. The receptor binding partners are all possible human proteins, or just receptors, or non-receptor proteins. Receptors can be further divided into type I and II receptors. We generated all possible degree distribution figures for these comparisons, and these are available from the authors upon request. Here, we only discuss a subset that demonstrates the most striking observation, namely that in the predicted receptor interactome, type I receptors display much more receptor partners as compared to GPCRs suggesting that GPCR heterooligomerization is rare compared to type I receptor heterooligomerization.

 

Receptor degree distributions with respect to all possible binding partners: Figure S7.1 compares the degree distribution of each receptor with all possible partners. Comparisons were made for both, the predicted and the HPRD receptor interactome graphs. The distributions are seen to obey a power-law [2].

 

Figure 1                        Degree distribution of receptors in terms of all possible partners. a. Histogram of the number of binding partners each receptor has in the predicted receptor interactome. b. Histogram of the number of binding partners each receptor has in the HPRD [3].

 

 

 

Average degree analysis:  We further analyzed the average interaction degree of the receptors with other proteins in the graph.

 

Table 4           Average degrees of receptors with other proteins. The mean or median interaction degree of those receptors who have at least one interactions partner is listed.

Number of interaction partners a receptor has:

Predicted

 HPRD

Median degree

4

3

Mean degree

18.3

5.7

 

 

 

 

GPCR degree distribution in terms of possible receptors partners: We compared the degree distributions of each GPCR receptor with respect to their receptors partners in the predicted and HPRD receptor interactome graphs. The results are shown in Fig. 2. The two distributions are quite similar to each other: GPCR to receptor interactions are sparse in both predicted and known receptor interaction graphs.

 

Figure 2                        Degree distribution of GPCRs with other receptors. a. Histogram of the number of receptor partners each GPCR has in the predicted receptor interactome. b. Histogram of the number of receptor partners each GPCR has in the HPRD [3].

 

Type I receptors degree distribution in terms of possible receptors partners: In Figure 3 , we compare the degree distribution of each type I receptor with respect to their receptors partners. Comparisons were made in both predicted and HPRD receptor interactome graphs. The two distributions are quite different. In the predicted receptor interactome, type I receptors have much more receptor partners compared to what is provided in the HPRD [3].

Figure 3                        Degree distribution of Type I receptors in terms of the receptor interaction partners. a. Histogram of number of receptor partners each Type I receptor has in the predicted receptor interactome. b. Histogram of number of receptor partners each Type I receptor has in the HPRD [3]

 

 

Based on the above analysis we conclude that in the predicted the receptor interactome, type I receptors interact more commonly with other receptor partners than do the GPCR’s.

 

 

3. Genes highly interacting with GPCR genes in the receptor interactome

 

Since GPCR’s are not interacting extensively with other receptors, we investigated in more detail interactions of GPCR’s with non-receptor proteins. Table S7.5 lists the top 20 ranked genes that are not listed in the HPMR [1] (our definition of non-receptor proteins) based on the largest number of predicted GPCR receptor partners. Several of these are chemokine related.

 

 

Table 5           Genes highly interacting with GPCR: Top 20 ranked genes that are not in HPMR [1] receptor list and are ranked high based on the number of predicted GPCR receptor partners.

Gene ID

Gene Symbol

GPCR Partner Sizes (Predicted)

GPCR Partner Sizes (HPRD)

2771

GNAI2

14

16

3458

IFNG

10

0

60675

PROK2

9

0

2335

FN1

8

1

6347

CCL2

8

5

6352

CCL5

8

6

1009

CDH11

7

0

6348

CCL3

7

4

2769

GNA15

6

12

2773

GNAI3

6

5

2776

GNAQ

6

16

3576

IL8

6

3

3627

CXCL10

6

0

408

ARRB1

6

7

6351

CCL4

6

3

6356

CCL11

6

4

6355

CCL8

5

5

6363

CCL19

5

2

6387

CXCL12

5

1

6774

STAT3

5

1

 

 

 

Bibliography

1.         Ben-Shlomo I, Yu Hsu S, Rauch R, Kowalski HW, Hsueh AJ., Signaling receptome: a genomic and evolutionary perspective of plasma membrane receptors involved in signal transduction. Sci STKE. 2003. 187: RE9

2.         Barabási1 AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: Understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 2004;5:101-113.

3.         Mishra GR, Suresh M, Kumaran K, Kannabiran N, et al. and Pandey A. Human protein reference database--2006 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2006 Jan 1; 34(Database issue) D411-4.